Mon 22 Mar 2010
3D in Movies; ‘Faking’ 3D a Studio Scam?
Posted by marc lougee under Uncategorized , Animation , cinematography , camera , stereoscopic , 3D StereoNo Comments
![]() |
With all the major studio releases hitting screens this Spring & Summer, there’s been much ado about ’stereoscopic 3D’ and what exactly that might mean for the ticket-buying audiences filing into theatres to see it. Long gone are the days of throw-everything-at-the-screen free-for-all’s like “Coming At Ya!”, with the 3D effect being forced down the viewer’s throat at every turn; but are they?
Not all stereoscopic 3D is really 3D, so the argument goes. Hence in point, the recent release of Tim Burton’s Alice In Wonderland, a major studio release if there ever was one, shot in 2D (as is traditionally the case for non-3D films), but augmented on the post production end for release in 3D. This is the Rubicon; is it to be, or not to be 3D?
Apparently, scores of folks are having all manner of trouble seeing the faux 3D effect without some manner of hassle, ranging from it merely being a nuisance (and closing one eye) to ripping the glasses off in a screaming as their eyes explode. Not really, but you get the point. Gizmodo has an interesting article up, written by a visual effects supervisor with a rant about the 3D that’s not really 3D; where AVATAR rocked the effect, making the transition for most of the planet from 2D to 3D seamless, he’s got some interesting stuff to say concerning the manipulation / augmentation of the film image into 3D after the fact, something he feels the studios will be pushing on us, the paying audience, more often in the coming months.
So grab an aspirin and have a look for yourself- be sure to read the commentary following, as there are some very interesting points being made concerning 3D generally. Cheers, Luge










